5/30 readings+Omar presentation response

In Fiske’s “Shopping for Pleasure,” the idea that consumerism was like religion was brought up.  However this cliche could only liken the two to a certain extent because Fiske asserted that there was still differences between them, such as how followers of religion must take in all the truth of their religion, however women could be more critical about consumerism since they can choose not to buy something.
In Jordan’s “Art of Necessity,” he explained how protesting could be done using artistic methods.  He said that “Art has clearly failed historically as a means to bring imagination and creativity to movements of social change.”  I find this interesting because this brings to mind traditional protests such as picketing as well as something like a flashmob.  I think the difference in effectiveness is of both methods is very obvious because flashmobs seem to be far more engaging to bystanders, whereas traditional protests can sometimes be completely tuned out by people walking by.

Omar’s presentation stood out to me because of the everyday resistance that he was interested in.  When I thought of everyday resistance before, I thought of small things done at work such as slacking or customizing uniforms.  I thought that it was cool to think about everyday resistance in terms of comedy.  Such as his joke about Timothy McVeigh, where he countered very racist ideas about those considered Muslim, with something funny.  Using comedy in that situation was interesting because it highlighted the absurdity of the stereotype in the first place.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Laotian Daughter and Monkey Dancer

5/30- Fiske

5/23 Kelly Loves Tony Part 2 Video Response