Gramsci, Foucalt 4/13
In
Gramsci’s article, Gramsci refutes the idea that philosophy is only used for
those in higher power or intellect. Instead, he argues that the study of
philosophy is a way of thinking that is meant for everyone in society. He
proves this by stating that philosophy can be embedded in language, common
sense/good sense, and popular religion. By reasoning philosophy in this way, I agree
with Gramsci that philosophical thinking can be used by the masses. His theory
can be seen in contemporary times by the fact that individual ideas of the
world and of themselves is shaped by the external environment. On the other
hand, Foucault’s article talks about how truth and power continually intersect
and challenge each other. Truth of information can be more believable when one
possesses societal power. However, I think due to the immediate spread of
information through technology and social media, a collective can spread as
much truth just as much as a person with some form of power (political,
economical, etc.). For instance, even though Kendall Jenner possesses social
and economical power and Pepsi has a reputation for providing a quality drink
worldwide, their actions were not dismissed by the masses as many people
critiqued their advertisement and spoke a different truth from what Pepsi and
Kendall were attempting to portray.
Comments
Post a Comment